Legal Opinion

Pacheco v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 27, 2001No. 98-71241; I & NS No. A 94-160-935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

I

Maria Pacheco’s lawful residence in the United States was predicated on her Temporary Protected Status (“TPS”) as a Salvadoran alien pursuant to § 303 of the 1990 Immigration Act. See Immigration Act of 1990, Pub.L. No. 101-649, § 303, 104 Stat. 4978, 5036 (1990) (reprinted at 8 U.S.C. § 1254a (notes)). Section 303 required that Salvadoran aliens who wished to travel abroad first obtain advance parole from the Attorney General. See § 303(c)(2), (4). Pacheco failed to obtain such parole when, on September 3, 1992, she left for El Salvador to visit her dying mother and to arrange…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Western Region v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Doe v. McAleenanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API