In the Matter of Golinski
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALEX KOZINSKI, Chief Judge.
Karen Golinski has been denied a benefit of federal employment because she married a woman rather than a man. I previously determined that violates this court’s guarantee of equal employment opportunity. See In re Golinski, 2009 WL 2222884, at *1 (9th Cir. Jan. 13, 2009). ** To avoid a difficult constitutional problem, I harmonized the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), 1 U.S.C. § 7; the statutes creating the benefit program at issue, the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP), 5 U.S.C. §§ 8901 et seq.; and this court’s commitment to equal employment…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ex Parte Duncan N. HennenSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- John H. Kerr v. National Endowment for the ArtsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Kenneth W. LEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert C. HUGHES, Jr.; Daniel C. Lanford, Jr., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gill v. Office of Personnel ManagementDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- Collins v. BrewerDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2010
- In Re BalasUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Semper v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Pollack v. DuffDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.