Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Karen Golinski

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 19, 2009No. 09-80173Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT   IN THE MATTER OF KAREN No. 09-80173 GOLINSKI* et ux.  ORDER Filed November 19, 2009 COUNSEL Argued by Rita F. Lin, Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Fran- cisco, California, who was joined on the briefs by James R. McGuire, Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, Califor- nia, for Karen Golinski. ORDER Karen Golinski has been denied a benefit of federal employment because she married a woman rather than a man. I previously determined that violates this court’s guarantee of equal employment opportunity. See In re Golinski,

2009…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Ex Parte Duncan N. HennenSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  4. John H. Kerr v. National Endowment for the ArtsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  5. Kenneth W. LEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert C. HUGHES, Jr.; Daniel C. Lanford, Jr., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API