Legal Opinion

Panama Canal Commission v. Federal Labor Relations Authority

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 17, 1989No. 87-4629PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Circuit Judge:

The Panama Canal Commission petitions for review of a decision of the Federal Labor Relations Authority dismissing the appeal by the International Organization of Masters, Mates and Pilots regarding an allegedly nonnegotiable provision of a collective bargaining agreement. For the reasons cited herein, we grant the petition for review, vacate the order complained of and deny enforcement, and remand the case to the FLRA to consider the issues presented by the order complained of on their merits.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The Panama Canal Commission (the “agency”) and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms v. Federal Labor Relations AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Department of Defense Dependents Schools, Alexandria, Virginia v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Western Region v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. Department of Defense, Office of Dependents Schools v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  3. A. Joyce Payne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  4. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Western Region v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Payne v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API