Legal Opinion

State v. Yancey

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 2002No. M1999-02131-SC-R11-CDPublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · AndersonE. Riley Anderson, J.

in which FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, C.J., and ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., and WILLIAM M. BARKER, JJ., joined.

We granted this appeal to determine the following issues: (1) whether the Court of Criminal Appeals, in reviewing the denial of pretrial diversion, erred by considering *555evidence presented at trial and failing to limit its review to evidence considered by the district attorney general; and (2) whether the trial court applied the correct standard in reviewing the district attorney general’s denial of pretrial diversion pursuant to a petition for writ of certiorari.

After a thorough review…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. HenningTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. HammersleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Arnold v. Tennessee Board of ParolesTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. CurryTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. PinkhamTennessee Supreme Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. McKimTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. OakesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  3. State of Tennessee v. Heather RichardsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State of Tennessee v. Gary HamiltonTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State of Tennessee v. Susan Gail StephensTennessee Supreme Court · 2016

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API