Legal Opinion

Confidential Informant v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 4, 2000No. 98-796 TPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

HEWITT, Judge.

This matter comes before the court on the Motion of the United States to Dismiss the .Complaint (“Motion to Dismiss” or “Defendant’s Motion”) pursuant to Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) 12(b)(1) and (4). Plaintiff alleges that he2 assisted the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) in the collection of taxes as a confidential informant. Plaintiff asserts that the reward he received did not constitute just compensation for the assistance he rendered.

In its Motion to Dismiss, defendant asserts that this court does not have jurisdiction to review the IRS’s…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Minehan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. Vargas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. Contreras v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  4. Whistleblower 14106-10W v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2011
  5. Doe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API