Legal Opinion

Vargas v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 27, 2014No. 12-508CPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

KAPLAN, Judge.

This case is before the Court on the motion of the defendant, the United States of America (hereinafter “the government”), to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) 12(b)(6). The plaintiff, Claudia Astrid Hurtado Vargas (“Hurtado”), a Colombian citizen, alleges that the government breached express and/or implied contracts it entered into with her to secure her services as a confidential informant in connection with criminal investigations that…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Austin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  2. Hicks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. Threshold Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  4. Ingham Regional Medical Center v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  5. Baistar Mechanical, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API