Legal Opinion

Minehan v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 26, 2007No. 05-924TPublishedCited by 186 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Bush, Judge.

This matter comes before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth herein, the court concludes that jurisdiction over this matter is absent. Defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the case is dismissed.

BACKGROUND

This opinion follows briefing by the parties on a number of issues which affect the jurisdiction of the United States Court of Federal Claims. Before examining the contours of this court’s jurisdiction, however, a brief summary of the facts which led to the current dispute is appropriate. The…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by186 opinions

  1. Lengen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. Jeremiah Harris v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  3. Bussie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. Woodson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  5. Moore v. Public Defenders OfficeUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

181 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API