Legal Opinion
Kirshenbaum v. General Outdoor Advertising Company
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 31, 1932PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Motion for reargument and to amend remittitur denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 258 N. Y. 489.)
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kirshenbaum v. General Outdoor Advertising Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fedor v. Mauwehu Council, Boy Scouts of America, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1958
- Commercial Warehouse Co. v. Hyder Brothers, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Bauer v. 141-149 Cedar Lane Holding Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Zimmerman v. Daggett & RamsdellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Mitterlehner v. Mercantile National Bank at DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.