Legal Opinion
Bauer v. 141-149 Cedar Lane Holding Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 15, 1956PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
42 N.J. Super. 110 (1956)
125 A.2d 884
LEON BAUER, MAX BAUER AND IRVING EISEN, ETC., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
141-149 CEDAR LANE HOLDING CO., INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 5, 1956.
Decided October 15, 1956.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.
Mr. Herbert A. Chary argued the cause for appellants.
Mr. George F. Losche argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Losche & Losche, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.
Plaintiffs sued defendant landlord for damage to their…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kirshenbaum v. General Outdoor Advertising Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Kuzmiak v. BrookchesterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Taneian v. MeghrigianSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Scatuorchio v. Jersey City Incinerator AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Hughes v. EisnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mayfair Fabrics v. HENLEYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Lambe v. ReardonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Clark v. WichmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Meyer Jewelry Co. v. Professional Building Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1957
- World Products, Inc. v. Central Freight Service, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.