Legal Opinion

Kirshenbaum v. General Outdoor Advertising Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 1932PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKellogg, J.

The plaintiff was the occupant of a store in a one-story building under a lease from the owner, the defendant Chapman. The landlord retained possession of the roof of the building and thereafter rented the same to the defendant General Outdoor Advertising Co., Inc. That defendant, as permitted by the lease, erected upon the roof a framework, from which to display advertisements for its customers. Thereafter, on several occasions, rain collected upon the roof, and, seeping through, dripped into the plaintiff’s store. The plaintiff tenant notified the defendant landlord, who made repairs. The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Santa Fe, Prescott & Phœnix Railway Co. v. Grant Bros. Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. International Products Co. v. Erie R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Marks v. Nambil Realty Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. Gill v. MiddletonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  5. Johnston v. . FargoNew York Court of Appeals · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Hogeland v. SibleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. President & Directors of Georgetown College v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  3. Ciofalo v. Vic Tanney Gyms, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. Chisolm v. StephensAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. Kuzmiak v. BrookchesterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API