Legal Opinion
Zimmerman v. Daggett & Ramsdell
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 17, 1955PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
34 N.J. Super. 81 (1955)
111 A.2d 448
W.F. ZIMMERMAN, INC., PLAINTIFF,
v.
DAGGETT & RAMSDELL, INC., DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided January 17, 1955.
Mr. Saul J. Zucker argued in favor of the motion.
Mr. Joseph P. Rose opposed the motion.
FOLEY, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).
This is a motion by the defendant for summary judgment.
The complaint, as amplified by the pretrial order, sets forth the following described claim for relief. Plaintiff, a cosmetic manufacturer and a sub-lessee of the defendant, in a building occupied in part by both parties, suffered damage to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. FaxonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Globe Home Improvement Co. v. Perth Amboy Chamber of Commerce Credit Rating Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
- Wade v. Six Park View Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Wade v. Park View Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Kirshenbaum v. General Outdoor Advertising CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
3Cited by8 opinions
- Planters Gin Co. v. Federal Compress & Warehouse Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- Kuzmiak v. BrookchesterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Mayfair Fabrics v. HENLEYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Ultimate Computer Services v. Biltmore Realty Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- Woburn Associates v. Kahn (In Re Hemingway Transport, Inc.)District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.