Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1986No. 18201-PRPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FELDMAN, Justice.

This case comes to us on stipulated facts and requires us to determine whether an escape clause in an automobile insurance policy issued by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) violates A.R.S. § 28-1170.01 (and its identical counterpart, A.R.S. § 20-1123.01) and is, therefore, void. The cited statutes create conclusive presumptions as to which policy provides primary and which excess coverage when two or more policies cover the same motor vehicle loss and the named insured in one of the policies is engaged in the automobile business. The trial court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. Mayflower Insurance ExchangeArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BogartArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Zurich-American Insurance v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BogartArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  3. Odom v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Schultz v. Farmers Insurance Group of CompaniesArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Rashid v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API