Legal Opinion

Jenkins v. Mayflower Insurance Exchange

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1963No. 6893PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JENNINGS, Justice.

Appellants were plaintiffs in a suit against defendant insurance company to collect a judgment previously obtained in a suit for personal injuries against insureds of the company. The case was submitted to the trial judge on a stipulated statement of facts and judgment was entered for the defendant. It is from this judgment that plaintiffs appeal.

Plaintiffs were passengers in a car owned by defendants-insureds. The car was being driven by John Parrott, an airman in the U. S. Air Force. Defendants-insureds were also in the car and had directed Par-rott to drive. As a result…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wildman v. Government Employees Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Schecter v. KillingsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Hoosier Cas. Co. of Indianapolis, Ind. v. FoxDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1952
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ArghyrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
  5. McCann Ex Rel. Osterman v. Continental Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Hughes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. NeeseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WilsonArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Sandoval v. ChenowethArizona Supreme Court · 1967

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API