Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 2, 1985No. 2 CA-CIV 5128PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Judge.

Can an insurance company exclude coverage to its named insured when the named insured is operating, with permission, an automobile owned by a person engaged in the automobile business? We answer that it cannot.

This case involves a question of insurance coverage for Deanne Sasselli, who was involved in an automobile accident that occurred on or about March 2, 1983, in the vicinity of Nogales, Sonora. Her insurer, the appellant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm), filed a declaratory judgment action requesting that the trial court declare the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Schecter v. KillingsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Zuckerman v. Transamerica InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Chase v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API