Legal Opinion
Rashid v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided February 8, 1990No. CV-89-0219-PRPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.
George Rashid (Rashid) petitions us to review a court of appeals decision holding that State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) was not liable for his uninsured motorist (UM) claim. See Rashid v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., No. 1 CA-CV 88-0346 (Ct.App. Apr. 18, 1989) (memorandum decision). We took review to determine whether State Farm’s UM “other insurance” clause violates public policy. Rule 23, Ariz.R.Civ.App.P., 17B A.R.S. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3) and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Motor Club of America Insurance v. PhillipsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Blakeslee v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- American Liberty Insurance Company v. RanzauTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WilsonArizona Supreme Court · 1989
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Lowing v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. GilmoreArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ArringtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- Cundiff v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2008
- Schultz v. Farmers Insurance Group of CompaniesArizona Supreme Court · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.