Schultz v. Farmers Insurance Group of Companies

OPINION

MOELLER, Justice.

JURISDICTION

The trial court held that a “non-duplication of medical benefits” endorsement in an automobile insurance policy was void. It initially declined to include Rule 54(b) finality language to make the ruling appealable. After failing to obtain special action relief in the court of appeals, the insurer sought such relief here. While the special action was pending, the trial court granted a renewed request to make its ruling appeal-able, and the insurer then appealed to the court of appeals. After oral argument on the special action, we accepted jurisdiction,…