Legal Opinion

Williams v. Holland

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 19, 1978No. 788DC98PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Chief Judge.

General Statute No. 8-50.1 provides that, “[i]n the trial of any civil action, the court before whom the matter may be brought, upon motion of either party, shall direct and order that the defendant, the plaintiff, the mother and the child shall submit to a blood-grouping test; provided. . . .” In Wright v. Wright, 281 N.C. 159, 188 S.E. 2d 317 (1972), the court held that this portion of the statute, applicable to civil actions only, is qualified by certain language found in that portion of the statute dealing separately with criminal proceedings. The portion of the statute…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Durfee v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Bruton v. . Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. In Re BlalockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Sorenson v. SorensonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  5. Peercy v. PeercySupreme Court of Colorado · 1964

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wake County Ex Rel. Carrington v. TownesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Withrow v. WebbCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Dorton v. DortonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Sutton v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Rice v. RiceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API