Legal Opinion

Dorton v. Dorton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 7, 1984No. 8319DC853PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

The court had no authority to issue the order appealed from and it is hereby reversed and set aside. G.S. 8-50.1 authorizes judges to order blood grouping tests only in cases “in which the question of parentage arises.” The parentage of the two children involved in this case is no longer an open question. It was long since set at rest in more ways than one. In the first place, by his own verified complaint filed thirteen years ago, plaintiff alleged that the two children were born of his marriage to the defendant. This allegation having been neither withdrawn, amended, nor…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. SaundersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Withrow v. WebbCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Williams v. HollandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Wilson v. ChandlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Webster Enterprises, Inc. v. Selective InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  2. Rice v. RiceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. State Ex Rel. Bright v. FlaskrudCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API