Legal Opinion

Withrow v. Webb

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 7, 1981No. 8028DC835PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

By his third assignment of error, defendant contends that the court erred in its second conclusion of law which is: “The defendant’s motion for blood test pursuant to N.C. G.S. § 8-50.1 is dismissed; issue of paternity between defendant and the minor child, Holly Lisa Webb, having been previously adjudicated by the court.” We disagree. We think Williams v. Holland, 39 N.C. App. 141, 249 S.E. 2d 821 (1978), is dispositive of the question raised. There the plaintiff initiated an action in district court seeking to have defendant ordered to pay arrearages under a Nevada court…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. Weston v. WestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Palchinski v. PalchinskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Watts v. WattsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  4. Sorenson v. SorensonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  5. Peercy v. PeercySupreme Court of Colorado · 1964

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tandra S. v. Tyrone W.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Heavner v. HeavnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. People ex rel. J.A.U. v. R.L.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  4. Wake County Ex Rel. Carrington v. TownesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Nancy Darlene M. v. James Lee M., Jr.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API