Legal Opinion

Wake County Ex Rel. Carrington v. Townes

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 15, 1981No. 8010DC1024PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECTON, Judge.

The sole issue in this appeal is one of first impression in North Carolina: whether an indigent defendant in a paternity suit instituted by the State has a constitutional due process right to court-appointed legal counsel. Based on the Fourteenth Amendment due process requirements of the United States Constitution, and on the Law of the Land provision in Article I, Section 19 of the North Carolina Constitution, 1 we hold that an indigent defendant has a right to appointed counsel in paternity suits instituted by the State.

I

Due process must be afforded when a State seeks to…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Corra v. CollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Settle by and Through Sullivan v. BeasleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State Ex Rel. Hamilton v. SnodgrassSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  4. State v. GuiceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Kennedy v. WoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API