Watford v. South Carolina Highway Department
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Rhodes, Justice:.
This is an action commenced by appellant to recover damages for loss of consortium and medical expenses resulting from his wife’s involvement in an automobile collision with a State owned patrol car. The lower court sustained respondent’s demurrer and dismissed the action, concluding that the husband’s suit was not authorized by statute. We agree and affirm.
The parties agree that the single issue presented is whether the South Carolina Governmental Motor Vehicle Tort Claims Act (Tort Claims Act) provides for recovery against the State by a husband for medical expenses and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hollifield v. KellerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
- Morris v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- Brazell v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
3Cited by7 opinions
- McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- McCall ex rel. Andrews v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Gosnell v. Dorchester School District No. 2Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- Belue v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- Belue v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.