Brazell v. City of Camden
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, Chief Justice.
This appeal is from an Order overruling defendant’s demurrer to the complaint, upon the ground that the complaint did not state a cause of action in that it is not alleged that plaintiff personally was injured in his person or property, but, on the contrary, a person other than plaintiff Chis wife) allegedly sustained personal injuries by reason of defect in a street.
Two separate actions were instituted against the City of Camden, one by Bertha Brazell for damage for pain and suffering resulting from a fall allegedly caused by defect in a street in the City of Camden;…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rice Hope Plantation v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
- Reeves v. City of EasleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
- McKenzie v. CITY OF FLORENCESupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
- Brooks v. One Motor Bus Carrying 1937-38 S. C. License V-1357, Motor No. 45590, Serial No. 40476Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- Hollifield v. KellerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- McCall ex rel. Andrews v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Harrison v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
- Watford v. South Carolina Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
- Belue v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.