Legal Opinion

Belue v. City of Spartanburg

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 1, 1981No. 21470Published

1DissentNess, Justice

(dissenting) :

I dissent. Appellant Carl Belue appeals from an order sustaining respondents’ demurrers to his complaint. I concur with that portion of the majority opinion sustaining the demurrers to his causes of action for the taking of private property and nuisance, and would reverse that portion sustaining the demurrer to his negligence cause of action.

Appellant’s complaint alleged he was entitled to money damages because respondents’ water main burst, flooding his store and ruining his merchandise. He sought to recover under three theories of liability:(1) The damage to his property was a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Chick Springs Water Co. v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  3. Rice Hope Plantation v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  4. Transportation, Inc. v. City of Falls ChurchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1979
  5. Brown Ex Rel. Estate of Brown v. Anderson County Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API