Legal Opinion

Gosnell v. Dorchester School District No. 2

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 12, 1990No. 23170PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory, Chief Justice:

This appeal is from an order granting summary judgment. We reverse.

Appellant’s wife was severely injured when the car she was driving collided with a school bus. Appellant commenced this action seeking damages for medical expenses incurred on his wife’s behalf and for loss of consortium. Respondent moved for summary judgment as to the loss of consortium claim alleging it is not an allowable claim under the South Carolina Tort Claims Act. The trial judge granted the motion.

The Tort Claims Act allows recovery to “any person who may suffer a loss proximately caused by a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Laird v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  2. Cook v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  3. Hughey v. AusbornSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  4. Sossamon v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  5. Watford v. South Carolina Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wright Ex Rel. Green v. Colleton County School DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  2. Sullivan v. DavisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  3. Baker Ex Rel. Estate of Baker v. SandersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  4. Davis v. TrippCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API