Legal Opinion

Hollifield v. Keller

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 31, 1961No. 17814PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moss, Justice.

There are two separate appeals involved in this case. The City of Columbia, South Carolina, is appellant in each case. The respondents are Katherine M. Hollifield and Joseph G. Hollifield, husband and wife.

The complaint in the wife’s case alleges that William Las-ley, one of the defendants, owns a building fronting on De-vine Street in the City of Columbia, South Carolina, and that he leases such building to Louie H. Keller, also a defendant, who operates in said building a place of business known as The Goody Shoppe. The complaint alleges that on top of the building is a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Rice Hope Plantation v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  2. Cook v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  3. Matthews v. Seaboard Air Line RailwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  4. Pendleton v. Columbia Ry., G. E. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  5. Chidsey v. Town of CantonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1846

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  2. Orange County v. HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. WhetstoneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  4. McCall ex rel. Andrews v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  5. Griffin v. Van NormanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API