Legal Opinion

Lumber Mutual Casualty Insurance v. Wells

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 9, 1946PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Perhaps it should be noted that the original policy, which was before the court when the issues were submitted to the jury, has no rider attached to it, as was indicated on the former appeal. Nor do the words, “passenger type,” appear on the face of the policy. This, however, is not material to the case.

It is provided in the contract of insurance that notice to any agent or other person “shall not affect a waiver or a change” in any part of the contract or “estop the company from asserting any right” under the terms of the instrument, unless endorsed thereon so as to form a part thereof; and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance v. MoreheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Foscue v. Greensboro Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. McCabe v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. American Potato Co. v. Jenette Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Mills v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Boyd v. Bankers & Shippers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Zibelin v. Pawtucket Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Suggs v. . BraxtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. Wright v. MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Commercial Carving Co. v. Manhattan Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API