Foscue v. Greensboro Mutual Life Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BROGDEN; J.
The question is this: Has a soliciting or collecting agent of an insurance company the authority to waive the payment of premiums provided in a policy of insurance or extend the time of payment thereof ?
The trial'judge charged the jury:, “Now, I charge you as a matter of law, and I quote to you from an opinion of the Supreme Court, where it says in the case, of Moore v. Accident Insurance Corp., reported in 173 N. C., 532: ‘It is abundantly settled that an insurance company will be estopped to insist upon a forfeiture .if by any agreement, either express or implied, by the¡course…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Johnson v. Rhode Island InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Biggs v. Insurance Co. (North Carolina Home)Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- Gazzam v. German Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Moore v. General Accident, Fire, & Life Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Hardin v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- High Country Arts and Craft Guild v. Hartford Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Hunter v. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Rocky Mount Savings & Trust Co. v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Thompson v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- McCabe v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.