Legal Opinion

Foscue v. Greensboro Mutual Life Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 10, 1928PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROGDEN; J.

The question is this: Has a soliciting or collecting agent of an insurance company the authority to waive the payment of premiums provided in a policy of insurance or extend the time of payment thereof ?

The trial'judge charged the jury:, “Now, I charge you as a matter of law, and I quote to you from an opinion of the Supreme Court, where it says in the case, of Moore v. Accident Insurance Corp., reported in 173 N. C., 532: ‘It is abundantly settled that an insurance company will be estopped to insist upon a forfeiture .if by any agreement, either express or implied, by the¡course…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Rhode Island InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Biggs v. Insurance Co. (North Carolina Home)Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  3. Gazzam v. German Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Moore v. General Accident, Fire, & Life Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. Hardin v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. High Country Arts and Craft Guild v. Hartford Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  2. Hunter v. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Rocky Mount Savings & Trust Co. v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Thompson v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. McCabe v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API