Legal Opinion

Zibelin v. Pawtucket Mutual Fire Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 1, 1948PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevix, J.

Unfortunately for the plaintiff, he failed to observe the terms of his policy and to comply with its plainly written provisions. The contract between the plaintiff and the Insurance Company embodied in the standard form of fire insurance policy is one prescribed by statute (G.S. 58-177), and its provisions have been held by this Court to be valid and just to. insured and insurer. Greene v. Ins. Co., 196 N. C. 335, 145 S. E. 616. The rights and liabilities of both under the policy must be ascertained and determined in accord with its terms. Insurance Co. v. Wells, 226 N. C. 574, 39 S. E. (2)…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sun Insurance Office v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Horton v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. Gorham v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Lovick v. Providence Life Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  5. Dibbrell v. Georgia Home InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Muncie v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Boyd v. Bankers & Shippers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Meekins v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Gardner v. Carolina InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Horton v. Iowa Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API