Legal Opinion

Wolf v. Megantz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1915No. Docket No. 94PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Wayne; Mandell, J. Assumpsit by Elias Wolf against Rose Megantz for breach of the covenants of a lease. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

The defendant executed and delivered to plaintiff on the 20th day of February, 1913, a written lease of her premises situate at 497 Hastings street, for a term of three years, at a monthly rental of $60. Plaintiff took possession of the premises on March 1st, the date stipulated in the lease, and began improving the interior for his use as a confectionery and tobacco store. After he had completed the alterations and repairs, and purchased fixtures, he was evicted by one Smith, who had purchased the premises from defendant upon a contract, prior to the making of the lease. Plaintiff then…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Friedland v. . MyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Smith v. MathisMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Cleveland Refining Co. v. DunningMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Hopkins v. SanfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Boyle v. BaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  2. Young v. CobbsSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  3. Young v. CobbsSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  4. Bowling v. MangumSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  5. Appleby v. SperlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API