Legal Opinion

Bowling v. Mangum

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 20, 1922No. 11057PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

This is a most unusual proceeding, and can only be understood by an extended statement.

There was a lot in the town of Timmonsville upon which a tobacco warehouse had been erected, and which belonged to Robert H. Tredway, Maynard Mangum, AY. R. Umstead, and R. T. Umstead, as tenants in common, Tredwky owning one-half undivided interest and each of the others named one-sixth. In April, 1916, Tredway had ,been declared insane, and was confined in a sanitarium. The property was in immediate'charge of Maynard Mangum. On the first day of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Snodgrass v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  2. Wolf v. MegantzMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Matheson v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  2. Rental Uniform Service of Greenville, South Carolina, Inc. v. K & M Tool & Die, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  3. Long v. Carolina Baking Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  4. Matheson v. McCormacSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  5. Chandler v. People's National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API