Bowling v. Mangum
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Cothran.
This is a most unusual proceeding, and can only be understood by an extended statement.
There was a lot in the town of Timmonsville upon which a tobacco warehouse had been erected, and which belonged to Robert H. Tredway, Maynard Mangum, AY. R. Umstead, and R. T. Umstead, as tenants in common, Tredwky owning one-half undivided interest and each of the others named one-sixth. In April, 1916, Tredway had ,been declared insane, and was confined in a sanitarium. The property was in immediate'charge of Maynard Mangum. On the first day of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Snodgrass v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Wolf v. MegantzMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by8 opinions
- Matheson v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Rental Uniform Service of Greenville, South Carolina, Inc. v. K & M Tool & Die, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
- Long v. Carolina Baking Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- Matheson v. McCormacSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
- Chandler v. People's National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.