Legal Opinion

Appleby v. Sperling

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1917No. Docket No. 156PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Saginaw; Kendrick, J. Assumpsit by Benjamin G. Appleby, doing business as B. G. Appleby Company, against Ferdinand Sperling and another for broker’s commissions. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

Plaintiff does business as B. G. Appleby Co. Defendants own certain premises described *682in the writing herewith set out. Plaintiff claims to have found a purchaser for the land agreeably with the terms of the writing, and one acceptable to defendants, who were, however, unable to show a perfect title to the land. Plaintiff sues to recover his commission.

“Exhibit A.
“Agency Contract — Made in Duplicate.
“I hereby place in the hands of B. G. Appleby Co. the following described property, 160 acres southeast quarter (ty,) of section twenty-five (25) town twelve (12) north range three (3) East,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wolf v. MegantzMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cain v. MasuretteMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Frischkorn Real Estate Co. v. HoskinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Gettleson v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Koffman v. PackMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Southern Trust Co. v. BunchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API