Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. Sanford

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1878PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Muskegon. Assumpsit on contract. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.

The questions raised in this case depend upon the construction to be given the written contract in view of the advances made thereunder.

Under this contract Sanford & Peck were to procure from certain lands owned by them, during the winter and spring of 1870 and 1871 not less than four million, and from that up to six million of pine saw logs. Hopkins & Co. were to “advance in cash from time to time as called for, to the amount of three dollars per thousand feet, say twelve thousand dollars upon four million feet of logs, and relatively the same for a greater number of thousand feet.” Certain…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Davis v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Industrial Works v. MitchellMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Frederick v. HillebrandMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Atlas Concrete Pipe, Inc. v. Roger J. Au & Son, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1979
  4. Wolf v. MegantzMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Carnegie, Phipps & Co. v. HoltMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API