Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Person

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 3, 1992No. 4:90-cv-40229PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NEWBLATT, District Judge.

This case involves several interesting questions of ERISA law. For reasons discussed, infra, the Court DENIES General Motors’ Motion to Dismiss; DENIES Metropolitan Life’s Motion for Summary Judgment; and DENIES Claudetta Person, Joyce Slavik, and Paul Sova, Jr.’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Before the Court are three dispositive motions by Cross-Defendants arising from the payment of an employment-issued life insurance policy to a decedent’s mother instead of his child, in spite of a state divorce decree…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tolstad v. TolstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Bomis v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
  3. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. FowlerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1996
  4. Wilcox v. WilliamsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1999
  5. Fallick v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API