Fallick v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GRAHAM, District Judge.
Plaintiff Arthur Falliek is a former employee of defendant Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, which is a subsidiary of defendant Nationwide Life Insurance Company (both hereinafter occasionally referred to as “Nationwide”). Falliek is a beneficiary of an employee medical benefit plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Plaintiff alleges that defendants improperly reduce or deny claims for benefits on the grounds that such claims are in excess of what defendants…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Arthur Fallick v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company Nationwide Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Allen v. Unionmutual Stock Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1997