Legal Opinion

Fallick v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 12, 1997No. C2-95-1273PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

GRAHAM, District Judge.

Plaintiff Arthur Falliek is a former employee of defendant Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, which is a subsidiary of defendant Nationwide Life Insurance Company (both hereinafter occasionally referred to as “Nationwide”). Falliek is a beneficiary of an employee medical benefit plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Plaintiff alleges that defendants improperly reduce or deny claims for benefits on the grounds that such claims are in excess of what defendants…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arthur Fallick v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company Nationwide Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  2. Allen v. Unionmutual Stock Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API