Legal Opinion
Wilcox v. Williams
District Court, C.D. California
Decided May 24, 1999No. CV 97-4074 ABCPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE: QDRO ISSUES
COLLINS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment re: QDRO issues and EW & C and the Williams Defendants’ cross-motions for summary judgment came on regularly for hearing before this Court on May 24, 1999. After reviewing the materials submitted by the parties, argument of counsel, and the case file, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment is GRANTED. EW & C and the Williams Defendants’ motions for summary judgment are DENIED.
I. Background
The issues presented in this case arise in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Anthony A. Calderone, Clark Hornbaker, Plaintiffs-Counterclaim Defendants v. United States of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Shirley W. Stewart v. Thorpe Holding Company Profit Sharing Plan, Thomas A. Carpenter, Thorpe Holding CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Smith v. Estate of SmithDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- Johnson v. Nanticoke Memorial Hospital, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Lundstrom v. YoungDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
- Shirley W. Stewart v. Thorpe Holding Company Profit Sharing Plan, Thomas A. Carpenter, Thorpe Holding CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000