Legal Opinion

Bomis v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 28, 1997No. 2:96-cv-71259PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HOOD, District Judge.

I. FACTS:

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff Karlis Bomis filed the instant suit against Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”) alleging that Defendant failed to pay long term disability insurance benefits. Defendant filed a counterclaim alleging it was entitled to reimbursement because it overpaid Plaintiffs benefit. Defendant states in its motion that the counterclaim may be dismissed because Plaintiff has reimbursed MetLife.

Plaintiff originally filed the action in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Clark v. NBD Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  2. Doan v. NSK CORP.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
  3. Allen v. Unionmutual Stock Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1997
  4. Sousa v. Unilab Corp. Class II (Non-Exempt) Members Group Benefit PlanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2002
  5. Furleigh v. Allied Group Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API