Legal Opinion

Uzarski v. Union National Bank

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 5, 1943No. Appeal, 19PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Kenworthey, J.,

This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order sustaining defendant’s affidavit of defense raising questions of law. The action is in trespass. The court was of opinion that; the statement of claim did not set forth a good cause of action.

The statement alleges that plaintiff, on January 6, 1941, deposited in defendant-bank $1,700 “in the name of her husband, Frank Uzarski, or herself, Cecelia Uzarski”; that she received a pass book which, at the present time, shows a deposit liability of $1,747.21; that the money so deposited consisted of her individual earnings and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Madden v. Glosztonyi Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Berhalter v. BerhalterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Nock v. Coca Cola Bot. Wks. Pgh.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Patterson v. Marine N. BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  5. Blick v. CockinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Blumner v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Wallaesa v. WallaesaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Runco Et Vir v. OstroskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Moorehead v. LopatinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Rodriguez v. DippCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API