Legal Opinion

Blumner v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1949No. Appeal, 124PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Linn,

This appeal by the plaintiff is. from an order sustaining preliminary objections to his complaint in his suit to quiet title. The defendants are his former wife, now Mrs. Hartmann, and the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. He contends that his suit is authorized by Rule 1061 of the Rules of Civil Proeeduré, subsection (b) of which provides, “The action may be brought (1) to compel an adverse party to commence an action of ejectment; (2) where an action of ejectment will not lie, to determine any right, lien, title or interest in the land or determine the validity…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Madden v. Glosztonyi Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Smith v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. O'Malley v. O'MalleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Bramberry's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Werle v. WerleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Albert v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Versailles Township Authority v. McKeesportSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Hunsberger v. BenderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Wallaesa v. WallaesaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Lazare v. LazareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API