Legal Opinion

Blick v. Cockins

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1916No. Appeal, No. 228PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal, No. 228, Oct. T., 1915, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Allegheny Co., Oct. T., 1909, No. 1139, in case of Adelaide Blick and Horace J. Miller v. James M. Cockins. Bill in equity to declare a trust ex maleficio. From the record it appeared that Marianna M. Cock-ins, wife of the appellee died on March 6,1907, domiciled in the State of Maryland, where the principal administration of her estate was had.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 228, Oct. T., 1915, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Allegheny Co., Oct. T., 1909, No. 1139, in case of Adelaide Blick and Horace J. Miller v. James M. Cockins. Bill in equity to declare a trust ex maleficio. From the record it appeared that Marianna M. Cock-ins, wife of the appellee died on March 6,1907, domiciled in the State of Maryland, where the principal administration of her estate was had. After her estate had been settled in that state, her husband, James M. Cockins, was declared in this State to be a trustee ex maleficio of her estate, in Blick v. Cockins, 234 Pa. 261,…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Tbe decree is affirmed on tbe opinion of tbe learned president judge of tbe Common Pleas, filed June 16, 1915.

2Cited by22 opinions

  1. Madden v. Glosztonyi Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Berhalter v. BerhalterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Deal's Adm'r v. Merchants & Mechanics Savings BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
  4. Erwin v. FelterIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Wilbur Trust Co. v. KnadlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API