Legal Opinion

Wallaesa v. Wallaesa

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 11, 1953No. Appeal, 225PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ross, J.,

This appeal raises the question whether a wife may recover from her husband, in an action of assumpsit, while the parties are separated but undivorced, one-half of the proceeds of the face value of a note which was executed to the parties in return for money lent to the maker by them during the period of their cohabitation as husband and wife.

The complaint alleges that $400, representing half of the face value of the note, was advanced by plaintiff out of her separate funds (the other half apparently having been supplied by defendant); that the promissory judgment note in…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Madden v. Glosztonyi Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Berhalter v. BerhalterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. O'Malley v. O'MalleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Narehood v. PearsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Sun Ray Drug Co. v. LawlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Hart v. O'MALLEYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Lindenfelser v. LindenfelserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Tallman v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Ray v. RayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. Byers v. Amerisure InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API