Legal Opinion

Runco Et Vir v. Ostroski

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 1949No. Appeal, 58PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

The question is whether a voluntary partition of real estate, held by the entireties, resulted from the conveyance by one spouse to the other who accepted it, paid the consideration and recorded the deed.

John Gapinski and his wife took title to the land in 1904. The husband, without joining his wife as a grantor, conveyed to her his interest in the property by deed dated July 30, 1910, reciting the payment and receipt of $3,000. She accepted the conveyance and recorded the deed: McDowell v. Cooper, 14 S. & R. 296 (1826); Blaisdell Filtration Co. v. Bayard & Co.,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Madden v. Glosztonyi Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Berhalter v. BerhalterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. O'Malley v. O'MalleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Bramberry's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Maxwell v. SaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Vasilion v. VasilionSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  2. Bruce v. DyerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. Diamond v. DiamondCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  4. Donvito v. CriswellOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Stop 35, Inc. v. HainesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API