Legal Opinion
Plummer v. Harvester War Depot, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 4, 1947No. Civil Action No. 5348PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KLOEB, District Judge.
This is an action brought by thirty-eight plaintiffs and five interveners under Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, Title 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., to recover overtime, liquidated damages, and attorney fees.
The plaintiffs and interveners were firemen at the Rossford Ordnance Depot, near Rossford, Ohio, which was operated during the period in question by the defendant under a cost plus fixed fee contract with the War Department. In 1943, the defendant inaugurated the Two-Platoon System for the Fire Department. Under this plan, plaintiffs and interveners were…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Johnson v. Dierks Lumber & Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Rokey v. Day & Zimmermann, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
- Muldowney v. Seaberg Elevator Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1941
- Eustice v. Federal Cartridge CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. Porter. Porter v. General Electric CoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Dunlop v. State of Rhode IslandDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1975
- López Figueroa v. ValdésSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1967
- Hofler v. Spearin, Preston & Burrows, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1966
- Love v. U. S. Rubber Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.