Legal Opinion

Love v. U. S. Rubber Co.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 1950No. 2508PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, District Judge.

Plaintiff seeks to recover from defendant, his employer, overtime compensation, liq*175uidated damages, and attorney’s fees under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-219 (herein FLSA.) During World War II defendant operated the Pennsylvania Ordnance Works, located in this district, in the production of munitions of war under a cost-plus-a-fixed-fee contract with the United States Government. Plaintiff and twenty-five others1 were engaged as fire fighters to protect the plant and equipment. The time involved is the period of “sleeping time” allowed in…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Powell v. United States Cartridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dovberg v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Foust Distilling Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Dovberg v. Dow Chemical CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API