Legal Opinion

Eustice v. Federal Cartridge Corporation

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided June 13, 1946No. Civ. 843PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONOVAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff commenced this action in behalf of himself and some 59 other persons similarly situated, to recover from defendant unpaid wages, overtime compensation, liquidated damages, and attorneys’ fees, under the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. 52 Stat. 1060, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. Plaintiff and said persons similarly situated will be referred to hereinafter as “plaintiffs” for convenience.

Plaintiffs claim there is due them as “unpaid wages and overtime” the aggregate sum of $140,157, and to this they ask that a like sum be added as liquidated…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. D. A. Schulte, Inc. v. GangiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Martino v. Michigan Window Cleaning Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Johnson v. Dierks Lumber & Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Porter. Porter v. General Electric CoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  2. Rokey v. Day & Zimmermann, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
  3. H. W. Ariens v. Olin Mathieson Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
  4. Guillermo Deyá v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1965
  5. Plummer v. Harvester War Depot, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API