Legal Opinion
Muldowney v. Seaberg Elevator Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 4, 1941No. 1701PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
On stipulation by and between the attorneys for the respective parties this case was tried before the Court without a jury.
This is an action brought by the plaintiff under the “Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938”. Act of June 25th, 1938, c. 676, §§ 1-19, 52 Slat. 1060-1069, title 29, §§ 201-219, U.S.C.A.
The defendant is a domestic corporation having its principal and sole place of business in the Borough of Brooklyn, City and State of New York.
During the entire period involved herein the defendant was engaged in the business ■of manufacturing and installing new…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Nashville, C. & St. LR Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Missel v. Overnight Motor Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
- Fleming v. Arsenal Bldg. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Cannon v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Noonan v. Fruco Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Rokey v. Day & Zimmermann, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.