Legal Opinion

Hofler v. Spearin, Preston & Burrows, Inc.

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided October 18, 1966PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarold Baer, J.

This is an action to recover overtime compensation, liquidated damages and attorney’s fees pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (U. S. Code, tit. 29, § 201 et seq.). The Act limits the working week to 40 hours and requires the payment of time and one-half for all time worked thereafter.

The plaintiff was employed by defendants as a watchman on a derrick boat. The defendants were engaged as general contractors for the construction of pier fenders to protect the towers of the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge. His duties consisted of checking the anchorage lights at nightfall and occasionally to note…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. D. A. Schulte, Inc. v. GangiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Overstreet v. North Shore Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Prendergast v. City of TempeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  2. Thompson v. Iowa Beef Packers, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  3. Thompson v. Iowa Beef Packers, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API