Legal Opinion
White Mountain Apache Tribe v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 7, 1984No. 22-HPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*289ORDER
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
The vital issue precipitating this order is whether a trial court has authority to enter orders binding on the parties. The problem of compliance with court orders is central to the effective administration of justice and has been brought into sharp focus by the repeated failure of plaintiff White Mountain Apache Tribe of Arizona (“plaintiff”) to comply with orders of the court.
FACTS
On November 7, 1983, the court entered an order, paragraphs 4 and 5 of which provided, pursuant to RUSCC 26(b)(3)(A) and Fed.R.Evid. 611(a), that expert testimony was to be presented by way…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Jerry F. Connell, Gary F. Burns and Conelco, Inc., Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., a Corporation, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Tyrone SILAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Billy G. Asberry v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- Rosemount, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Beckman Instruments, Inc., Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Matthews v. Secretary of the Dept. of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Metadure Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Sioux Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- White Mountain Apache Tribe of Arizona v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Reading Anthracite Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.