Legal Opinion
Reading Anthracite Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided October 31, 1985No. 519-84CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S PETITION FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDERS
REGINALD W. GIBSON, Judge:
BACKGROUND
On July 11, 1984, the plaintiff, Reading Anthracite Company, filed a petition for a refund of $37,416.75 paid under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act1 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Subsequently, on October 10, 1984, the case was transferred to the United States Claims Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1491, 1631 (1982) following which plaintiff filed an amended complaint on November 29, 1984.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Smith v. AyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Taub v. HaleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Mohamed Ali and Nadia Ali v. A & G Company, Inc. And Saadi IbrahimCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gary L. Adkins v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- First State Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Strand Electric Service Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Gary L. Adkins v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987