Legal Opinion

Woods v. City & County of San Franciso

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 7, 1957No. Civ. 17060PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, J. pro tem. *

The plaintiff Richard Woods, a minor, 10 years of age, was injured while playing in a school building that was in the process of construction. The child was admittedly a trespasser but the plaintiff alleges the action comes within the attractive nuisance doctrine. The defendant’s special and general demurrers to plaintiff’s second amended complaint were sustained without leave to amend and judgment was entered accordingly. Plaintiffs have appealed from the judgment.

The pertinent allegations of the second amended complaint insofar as this appeal is concerned are contained…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Peters v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Barrett v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Loftus v. DehailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Hale v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Garcia v. SoogianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Schilz v. Walter Kassuba, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Mikkelson v. RisoviNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Joslin v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Parrott v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API